Tag: Dan Hurley

My Exciting, Memorable and Disappoint Return to Gampel to See UConn-Xavier

This January has been four weeks of heartbreak for Huskies fans, and probably the most challenging month the program has experienced since the final years of Kevin Ollie’s tenure. At this time last month, fans were rightfully believing UConn was the best team in the nation and would win the Big East. Now, the Huskies are 5-6 in conference play after Wednesday’s home loss to Xavier, and both Husky nation and the wider college basketball fanbase are wondering if the team is capable of pulling itself together in February, or will instead stumble into the conference and NCAA tournaments.

Together with an electric crowd, I got to see UConn up close at both its best and worst in at Gampel Wednesday against Xavier in an 82-79 loss. In the first half which ended with UConn down 15 points, I saw a team that is a mess both offensively and especially defensively. This collection of players is incapable of both stopping  opponents one-on-one and making high-quality shots, and does not communicate well with one another on either end of the floor. In the second half, the Huskies became a completely different team. They constantly both attacked the basket and scored on layups and free throws, while hitting both open and challenging perimeter shots. On defense, they used both multiple zones and constant ball pressure to force turnovers and generally just make a formidable Musketeers offense uncomfortable (and yet they still scored more points in the second half). As a result, UConn came roaring back into the game and almost made an unforgettable comeback. It cut the deficit to one multiple times, but a few costly mistakes on multiple ends in the final moments thwarted a comeback, resulting in the Huskies falling to 5-6 in the Big East and still searching for answers on how to beat the best teams in the conference.

It was very sad to see UConn lose in person at Gampel, especially sense you could sense how eager the fans were to see the Huskies get a win they desperately needed. Still , I loved the experience and will remember the game for a long time. Despite losing to Xavier, there were a few positives both the team and the fans could take from the games, which they can hopefully learn from and use to get back on track in February. At the same time, there were weaknesses that continued to present, which UConn needs to mitigate and solve if it wants to be a threat in March. Below, I go into detail about both some positive and negative observations I took from the game.

The Positives

  1. Jordan Hawkins Continues to Emerge as a Star

During the preseason, there was a lot of talk about how Hawkins had significantly improved as an offensive player and could emerge as one of the best scorers in the Big East. In non-conference play and the early portion of the Big East schedule, Hawkins was a reliable scorer but only occasionally took over games. Over the last four games however, Hawkins has been the Huskies best player and carried the team even when he has gotten very little help. The sophomore has scored 20 or more points three times and averaged 23 while shooting 42 % from three and over 53% overall, even as the team has gone 1-3.

Hawkins was sublime against Xavier in the second half after a quiet start, and finished with 28 points while shooting 5-10 from beyond the arc and making all seven of his free throws. Despite the Musketeers defense keying in on him, Hawkins was able to get free off screens and knock down huge 3-pointers, even with defenders draped over him several times. He also continued his recent habit of attacking the basket when the opportunity arose. Hawkins was able to make some challenging layups and consistently get himself to the charity stripe. He single-handedly kickstarted the UConn offense and got the team and the crowd back into the game, and was the best player on the court. It’s just a shame that his effort couldn’t be rewarded with a comeback win.

Besides his scoring, Hawkins has visibly taken on a bigger leadership role in the last month, while continuing to be a solid rebounder and defender. Hawkins still can improve his ball handling (he had three turnovers against Xavier) and tighten up his defense, but if he continues to play at this level than he will be in position to be drafted high in the first round of the NBA draft if he chooses to leave UConn after the season. Hawkins is demonstrating that he is capable of leading the Huskies on a possible March Madness run, something no other Husky is doing right now. Let’s just hope the team gets back on track and becomes capable of going on such a run.

  • Tristen Newton Seems to be Turning a Corner on Offense

For much of the Big East schedule, Newton has been a disappointment at point guard. The senior transfer, whom was one of the best offensive players in the American Athletic Conference at East Carolina last season at shooting guard, was playing extremely passively on offense earlier this month and appeared uncomfortable running the offense. Yes, Newton had been inconsistent on offense the entire season, but gone was the player early in the season whom constantly attacked the basket and got to the free throw line, was a credible 3-point threat, and handled the ball effectively. In addition to Newton’s lack of aggressiveness, he appeared to struggle with sharing the responsibility of running the offense alongside Andre Jackson, who was injured and then coming off the bench when Newton got off to a strong start on the season. Combine Newton’s poor offensive play with an inconsistent performance on defense, and UConn fans had a legitimate gripe with the big-time transfer.

In the two games before the contest against Xavier (at Seton Hall and home against Butler), Newton finally started to demonstrate the aggressiveness Dan Hurley was looking for. He scored 11 points in both games while going a combined 11-12 at the free throw line, and had a combined six assists (unfortunately, Newton also committed five turnovers). Amazingly, this was the first time he had scored in double figures in consecutive games for the first time all season. Newton’s awakening from his slumbers set the stage for a very strong performance against the Musketeers.

Newton gave his all against Xavier offensively. He was UConn’s best player in the first half while almost everyone else was struggling, and continued to attack the rim in the second half while also hitting two timely treys. Newton finished with 23 points, tying a season high, and went 6-12 from the field and 9-11 on free throws. These were the most field goals Newton had drained in a game for the Huskies. While Newton made some poor decisions with his passing, committing five turnovers, he did a very strong job of moving the ball and pushing the tempo, especially in the second half, while playing with high intensity throughout. Newton recognized he needed to step up with Andre Jackson and the other guards besides Hawkins struggling, and he helped UConn right the ship in the second half and put Xavier’s defense on its heels in the second half. It may not have been quite good enough for a win, but Newton helped demonstrate what the team’s offense needs to do if the Huskies are going to go on a winning streak.

Hopefully, Newton’s memorable performance Wednesday can continue to be built upon. Newton’s better at earning free throws than almost anyone in college basketball, and if he can sustain his improved shooting and tighten up his ball handling and defense, than UConn may finally have the versatile player they thought they were getting out of the transfer portal. Newton may not be able to fit the role of a traditional point guard, but if he continues to play to his strengths and emerge as a leader, it will take a huge load off of Jackson, Adama Sanogo, and the rest of the team’s guards. I think that Newton can sustain this level of play and Dan Hurley can push him effectively. As a result, the Huskies will improve in February and hopefully when it matters most in March.

  • The Use of Zones and Heightened Pressure on Defense Caused Xavier to be Less Efficient in the Second Half

Even as UConn’s man-to-man defense has sucked and been extremely foul-prone for the last month, particularly when guarding players that are attacking the paint, Dan Hurley has been extremely reluctant to make any adjustments, whether that is playing zone or planning Sanogo and Donavon Clinigan together. This has resulted in the team allowing opponents to come back and win multiple games, and the players to ultimately lose confidence on both ends. After his defense’s ugly performance in the first half against Xavier however, Hurley finally took the plunge and made significant defensive adjustments in the second half, which were responsible for the Huskies nearly making an incredible comeback. It  may have taken way too long to happen, but Hurley’s flexibility on the defensive end may be a great sign going forward.

While UConn was more likely to struggle against defending Xavier’s elite offense playing man-to-man, it’s poor defense in the first half was very predictable. The Musketeers jumped out to a 9-0 lead and were ahead by double digits for almost the entire half, and ultimately went into the break shooting 50% and up 2-24. The Huskies got beat off the dribble constantly and allowed many open layups, and did a poor job of defending the rim. They also surprisingly struggled to stop Xavier beyond the arc, allowing several open threes as players did a poor job of closing out. Alex Karaban, Jackson and Sanogo especially struggled on defense, with Jackson continuing his habit of allowing players to below by him and then picking up ticky-tack fouls going for steals.

As fans are well aware of, Hurley isn’t a coach who makes quick adjustments or inclined to change up his defense. But with Xavier again shredding UConn on that end, he finally decided he had no choice but to switch up to a zone. Bu alternating between 1-3-1 and 2-3 zones and pressuring the Musketeers full-court, the Huskies were able to regularly force turnovers and offensive fouls and caused them to look discombobulated, especially as the half wore on. Jackson was especially effective on defense with these adjustments, as they allowed him to use his athleticism to hound defenders. UConn’s aggressive defensive certainly got the crowd into the game, and it also allowed the offense to get more fastbreak opportunities and open shots everywhere on the floor.

I strongly feel that if the Huskies hadn’t adjusted on defense, it would have easily lost by double digits. Playing zone and upping their ball pressure made the team much better on both ends of the floor, and allowed it to be in position to possibly win. While UConn should be much more effective playing man-to-man in the next two games at DePaul and Georgetown, Hurley absolutely should continue to experiment with playing zone and pressuring ballhandlers in half-court sets for a few minutes. He could possibly even play Sanogo and Clinigan together and see how effective they are on both ends. The same goes for experimenting in practice. By doing all this, UConn can be in better position to slow down Marquette’s elite offense and earn a huge home win next Tuesday.

  •  The Crowd Was Outstanding

The XL Center can be an intimidating environment for opposing players, as it can host more fans. However, it cannot compare to Gampel Pavilion, especially when it is sold out and many students show up. The crowd was charged from the opening tip, and were able to still maintain solid energy throughout the first half even as UConn played terribly. However, it was the second half when the energy ramped up. As the Huskies began to force turnovers and Hawkins caught fire, the crowd noise became deafening. They stayed standing throughout the remainder of the game, and all this excitement helped rattle the Xavier players and cause timeouts. Even when UConn couldn’t get over the hump and take the lead in the final minutes of the game, the crowd continued to provide players encouragement. The fan’s excitement was infectious to experience in person, and heartwarming to see considering how much the team has been struggling. Let’s hope the Huskies can turn things around and reward the fanbase for its support.  

The Negatives

  1. The Poor Play from the Bench, Karaban and Jackson

UConn’s bench play has been weak for much of the Big East schedule after being a huge strength during the nonconference schedule, and it was no different against Xavier. The quartet of Naheim Alleyne, Hassan Diarra, Clinigan and Joey Calcaterra scored just six points and grabbed three rebounds in 35 minutes while shooting 2-9 and recording no assists. Calcaterra and Alleyne largely couldn’t hit the broad side of a barn, going 1-6 from three. Clinigan had maybe his worst game of the season, missing two crucial free throws and picking up two ugly fouls in just seven minutes. His struggles forced Sanogo to play 33 minutes. None of the other bench guys particularly distinguished themselves defensively, either.

Karaban’s struggles weren’t a huge surprise on defense. He was facing a pair of strong big men in  Zach Freemantle and Jerome Hunter who are both bigger and stronger than the freshman. Still, Karaban did not box out great and grabbed just three rebounds in 35 minutes. He was mostly MIA on offense, scoring just five points with only one assist and missing two of three 3-pointers. The freshman will bounce back offensively, but he needs to be more aggressive and badly get stronger in the offseason. It will be a huge help when Samson Johnson fully returns from injury and takes some of those minutes.

While Karaban’s inconsistency is to be expected from a freshman, Andre Jackson’s is much more concerning. The junior ability to score just enough and keep defenses honest has completely evaporated in January (just under five points per game on 30% shooting overall and under 25% from deep). Jackson, who started Wednesday’s game by missing his first seven shots and was 3-12 overall, still rarely scores on anything more than dunks, floaters or open 3-pointers. Worse, Jackson’s passing and decision-making has gone down as the Huskies have floundered. He has averaged nearly two turnovers per game in January and made crucial ones against Seton Hall and Marquette. Jackson’s assist numbers have gone down (he had two against Xavier , and he is regularly playing out of control and asking teammates to make plays they are incapable of doing. For example, in the second half Jackson threw an alley-oop pass to Sanogo on a fastbreak, even though Sanogo doesn’t have the vertical left to finish that play, missed an open dunk and putback, and was called for a controversial goaltend which he also fouled on, leading to a 3-point play which halted a UConn run. And in addition to Jackson’s offensive struggles, I have also talked about the overaggressive defense which has regularly put the junior captain in foul trouble, and Jackson’s inconsistency with keeping players from driving by him.

While other players haven’t been great lately Jackson’s decline has hurt the Huskies very badly. His play has declined across the board, as well as his leadership and confidence in games. Jackson will have to play more under control on offense while figuring out where he can best contribute and reestablish his identity as a lockdown defender. His level of play took a jump around this time last year. If Jackson can do that again, it will take pressure off of the Huskies stars and allow the team to be a big threat again both in the conference and especially nationally.

  • The Huskies Yet Again Played a Bad Half, and Made Critical Mistakes in the Final Minutes  

In all of UConn’s six losses, a big theme is the team not playing competitively for all 40 minutes. Usually this has been the case in the second half, as the team was either up or tied at halftime in the first five losses. Wednesday’s game was a big reversal, with UConn playing its worth first half of the season by far. It looked all out of sorts on both ends, and Dan Hurley took way too long to call timeouts and refused to change up his defense despite his players getting burned on that end. Whether the team was not well-prepared enough or tin a state of shock after falling behind by so much can be debated, but either way the opening 20 minutes were an embarrassment. There is no good reason for the Huskies to put together a full game and make the changes to ensure they do.

By falling behind by 15 at halftime, the Huskies had almost no margin for error during their comeback. After they cut the deficit to a basket in the final minutes multiple times, errors raised their ugly heads. First, Newton was called for an offensive foul when driving to the basket along the right baseline with 4:03 remaining and the score 73-72, with the officials ruling that he pushed off. Then with score 78-77, Hawkins slipped on a drive and lost the ball before fouling two minutes later. After a layup by Jack Nunge, Newton had a very similar turnover a minute later. UConn was able to force a turnover on the next play, but Dan Hurley than called a timeout with 20 seconds left as Hawkins drained a jumper, wiping away the basket. Xavier called a timeout 11 seconds later with the same score to give the Huskies a chance to set up a final scoring play, but whatever was drawn up was blown up by excellent Musketeers defense. Desmond Claude bailed them out when he fouled Newton with two seconds left, but he unfortunately made the second free throw he was trying to miss, depriving the team’s bigs any chance at scoring on a putback. In a vacuum, most of these errors were understandable considering how desperate the team was playing and their urgency to finally take the lead. However, they added up, and UConn was handed its second consecutive loss by a basket.

Throughout Hurley’s tenure in Storrs, UConn has been sadly famous for losing close games to good teams again and again. It looked like things may finally change after the 14-0 start, but so far that has proven to be just a mirage. To put it bluntly, UConn needs to learn how to execute down the stretch and make winning plays in close games, and fast. Otherwise, it is not going far in tournament play yet again, and Hurley’s seat will start to get warm.

  • A lack of Fundamentals and Smarts When Playing Man-to-Man Defense

I’ve alluded to the poor defense in the first half throughout this article, but I had to devote an individual section to it considering just how lousy the D was. Among other things, it featured:

  1. Doing a terrible job of limitingdribble penetration, leading to either quality layups or open baskets for bigs or kickouts to the perimeter for open shots
  2. Poor help defense and communication among players, helping lead to Xavier foul shots as well
  3. Poor rim protection, particularly by Sanogo
  4. A loss of confidence by the entire team, which carried over onto the offensive end.

Almost all defenses would initially struggle to stop the Musketeers, and their ball movement and ability to make tough shots was remarkable to see in person. Still, there is no excuse for UConn’s man defense to be this bad against every strong opponent. Even if playing zone is somewhat effective, you can’t do that for 40 minutes against any opponent. I hope that the Huskies worked a lot on improving their defense in every facet of the game during their 6-day layoff between games, and that it will pay dividends immediately.  

  • Dan Hurley needs to be better  

Hurley is a solid coach and a great program-builder and recruiter. Players and recruits seem to love competing for him and Hurley’s high-energy style. That being said, at some point Hurley needs to figure out the issues with this team and start beating tough opponents so the players are ready for March Madness and UConn gets a good seed. He needs to make quicker adjustments, especially in-game, be willing to remove players for a short time if they are not executing, and just be more flexible on both ends of the floor. Hurley prides himself at being a defensive coach, and it’s up to him to figure out a way to improve the Huskies man defense and put players in position to succeed. Ditto on the offensive end, especially with getting more out of the bench players. Starting the season so well was thrilling, and this is probably Hurley’s most talented team at Storrs on paper. But it ultimately doesn’t matter if the team isn’t mentally tough and the program fails to go on a tournament run.  

UConn Must Execute on Defense to Beat Xavier

With UConn primed to play its biggest game of the season tomorrow home in Storrs against Xavier and your esteemed writer in attendance (a Christmas present), it is a good time to look at the No. 19 Huskies (16-5, 5-5 in the Big East) and figure out what they needs to do well to shut down the No. 12 Musketeers (16-4, 8-1), which is first in the conference and has an elite offense. Xavier has the best starting five offensively in the conference and can score efficiently from all areas of the floor, as UConn learned in its devastating 83-73 loss on New Year’s Eve.

The Huskies looked great on both ends of the floor in its 86-56 win against Butler on Saturday, but it’s hard to say the team is rounding a corner in any way when the Bulldogs are already a bad team that was missing its best player. UConn must beat Xavier and go over .500 again to show it can be an upper echelon team in the Big East and gain momentum heading into what should be two comfortable wins at DePaul and Georgetown. It should be favored to win at Gampel, but there are multiple areas the Huskies must play well in to emerge victorious, starting with playing quality defense.

Below, I talk about what UConn needs to do well defensively to win Wednesday. I am not sure if the team has the skills and mental fortitude to slow down Xavier’s offense and win what should be a close game, but it’s time for the team to put up or shut up. I look forward to being there with nervous anticipation, and will provide you dear readers with my observation’s on the team’s performance in many areas and the crowd atmosphere within the next few days. Let’s go!

The Defense Needs to be Smart and Flexible  

Starting in mid-December against Georgetown, UConn’s previously elite D began to slip, and the Xavier loss initiated lousy defensive performances in each of its losses over the next three weeks, with the team’s win against Creighton the lone receipt. After the Huskies took a 50-43 lead three minutes into the second half in Cincinnati, Xavier’s offense started dominating their defenders and never let up. UConn could not stay in front of Xavier’s guards, and they attacked the basket constantly, either scoring around the rim or finding bigs Zach Freemantle, Jack Nunge and Jerome Hunter for easy baskets. Most frustratingly, the Huskies were unable to play smart defense and avoid unnecessary contact, resulting in 23 free throws on 28 attempts. Ultimately, the Musketeers shot over 60% inside the arc and scored 1.12 points per possession (PPP). With all the talent Xavier has, they are fully capable of repeating this success Wednesday.

The inconsistent defense and inability to defend players without fouling continued in the next game at Providence, with the Friars making 29! free throws and winning by 12 despite making five fewer field goals tan UConn. After a strong performance against Creighton, the defense again wilted throughout the next two games against Marquette and St. John’s, as the team’s scored at least 1.10 PPP. After a great first half defensively against Seton Hall, the Huskies allowed the Pirates to score 41 points and shoot over 60% in the final 20 minutes to come back from 17 down and hand UConn a devastating last-second loss.

In these four losses, the team continued to struggle mightily with defending the rim. The guards were beat off the dribble constantly and Husky bigs could not defend the rim effectively, leading to layups or free throw opportunities. The Husky defenders did a particularly poor job of staying in front of their man and avoiding biting on pump fakes, leading to either touch fouls as players reached for the ball as a player got past them or guys jumping in the air and fouling opponents after they faked a shot (Andre Jackson and Alex Karaban seemed like were the biggest offenders in these categories). UConn has shot fewer free throws than their opponents in all five losses and recorded more turnovers in four. UConn players have seemed to frequently miscommunicate with each other and leave players wide open after going to defend another opponent, leading to easy baskets. Of course, all these issues seemed to crop up down the stretch in these losses, leaving the Huskies looking rattled. Combine all these factors with not boxing out consistently on rebound opportunities and an obvious lack of hustle at times, and you have some of the poorest defending since Dan Hurley’s first year in Storrs.

While UConn looked much more disciplined on defense against Butler, they were still playing a team that lacks guards who can attack off the bounce and which was missing star big man Manny Bates. In Xavier, it is matching up against a squad that shoots 39.7% from three and is also excellent in the paint. First, Husky players just need to fight harder to get over screens and stay in front of their man when defending one-on-one. It sounds cliché, but players have been lazy and fundamentally unsound on defense at times, especially when also struggling offensively. Along the same lines, defenders need to avoid committing costly ticky-tack  touch fouls or leaving their feet on defense after fakes. If the Huskies can control their hands and stay on the floor when defending, then they should avoid the foul trouble which has plagued them and force Xavier to win by taking tough shots. In addition, players need to recognize they can’t overextend too much on the Musketeers out on the perimeter, as it could result in easy drives to the basket and defenders being unable to recover. As great of a 3-point shooting team as Xavier is, UConn needs to be more concerned with protecting the paint and avoiding fouls. It has defended the perimeter extremely well throughout the season, and I think it will do a solid job again Wednesday. Finally, the Huskies and especially their bigs need to box out more effectively, especially off perimeter shots and Hurley needs to reiterate this to his guys. I would hope the ending against Seton Hall gets that message across to the team.

At the same time, UConn and Hurley need to make adjustments. Freemantle absolutely dominated Karaban last game using his size and athleticism, and could absolutely do so again if he is not double-timed. In some situations, Hurley needs to be willing to try double-teams on other hot players as well. In addition, he should be willing to let players switch defensively in certain situations. UConn should play zone as well if Xavier is scoring easily. A 2-3 zone could prevent guards from being able to easily score in the paint or get the ball into the bigs. Such a zone could also allow the Huskies to use both Sanogo and Clinigan for small stretches, providing both rim protection and a big advantage on the boards. With Samson Johnson finally back from injury, he can hopefully provide the team much needed rim protection. I am sure UConn has a detailed defensive game plan ready they will try to follow. What they need to do is be able to adjust when things aren’t going the team’s way. The Huskies defense failed to do that at Xavier and all their losses.

During Hurley’s tenure at UConn, the program has hung its hat on being relentless on defense and shutting down the paint. The team was doing that earlier in the season, and it still has great defensive numbers overall when you look at analytics, including being ranked 13th nationally on KenPom. It is time for the Huskies to regain their identity and play strong defense for 40 minutes. While the offense must meet certain goals as well, UConn will ultimately win or lose with their defense. Time to buckle up.

UConn Dominant Across the Board in Winning The PK85 Invitational

Starting with UConn’s coming-out party as a national power in the early 90’s up through Kevin Ollie’s 2014 championship squad, the Huskies had plenty of signature regular season performances over the span of just a few days, with these weeks frequently being a signal of tournament success down the line. These unforgettable weeks dried up in the last few years of Ollie’s tenure, and Dan Hurley had not quite brought them back even as the program improved the last three seasons. Until now.

UConn‘s performance at the Phil Knight Invitational over Thanksgiving weekend was remarkable. The Huskies curb—stomped their way through the competition in Portland to win the championship. They blew out Oregon on Thanksgiving and then wearing down and pulling away from Alabama and then Iowa State in the tourney title game. Ultimately, UConn won the games by an average of 19 points, improving to 8-0 and jumping all the way to No. 8 in the AP Top 25.

As I discuss more below, the games were especially satisfying to watch because of the unique ways UConn won them. Against Oregon, it won 83-59, setting a program record for 3-pointers made in a game with 17 and completely shutting down the Ducks backcourt. It then beat a highly talented Alabama team with more excellent defense and star performances by Adama Sanago and Jordan Hawkins. Finally, the Huskies overcame Iowa State’s relentless defense and foul trouble, relying on their dominance of the boards and great performances on both ends by freshman Donavon Clinigan and Andre Jackson to win 71-53. The team’s depth and cohesiveness were reflected in Clinigan being awarded the tournament MVP.

UConn has won all its games by at least 15 points, and scored over 70 in each while holding opponents under 60 five times. It has shot up to No. 6 in the KenPom standings, and is the only program in the country that is ranked in the top 10 in both the site’s offensive and defensive algorithms. It is also the highest UConn has been ranked in the poll since it was ranked eighth in January of 2012. The team’s start makes a compelling case that it is the most talented team UConn has had since then, and that the Huskies are very capable of winning the Big East and going on a significant run during March Madness. I know that things can change quickly, especially due to injury, but I am sky high on the Huskies right now.      

Here are a few observations about UConn’s play at the Phil Knight Invitational.

Huskies Display Their Ability to Pull Away Against Quality Opponents

Last season, UConn had an ugly habit of getting ahead against good teams, and then allowing them to rally back before losing by a few baskets. It hurt their seeding in the NCAA Tournament and then defined its loss to New Mexico State in the first round. This group is very different however, and eventually put its boot on the neck of Alabama and Iowa State and did not take it off.

First, the Huskies poor shooting early in the second half allowed the Crimson Tide to rally from 14 points down and tie the game multiple times. With less than nine minutes remaining, UConn completely flipped the script when Sanago and Hawkins returned from foul trouble and Newton got hot. Sanago and Newton went on a 16-1 run all their own. Sanago started dominating in the paint and hit a three, while Newton started bullying his way to the line and hit a three, ultimately giving the Huskies a 68-53 lead with less than six minutes remaining. Sanago finished with 25 points, and Newton had 9 with eight assists and four steals. Three other players (Hawkins, Alex Karaban, and Joey Calcaterra) were in double figures.

While UConn led the entire time against ISU, the Cyclones were able to keep it close with their defense, as the Huskies struggled to make shots and committed a lot of sloppy turnovers. ISU got it to within single digits in the open minutes of the second half, and trailed 53-48 with 9:47 remaining and Hawkins on the bench with four fouls (He would never return). Alex Karaban immediately kickstarted a 7-0 run with a three, and the Huskies ability to continue to dominant the boards, attack the basket and get easy looks and free throws for Newton and Clinigan, and most importantly play outstanding defense let them immediately regain control of the game and cruise to the victory. Clinigan had 15 points and 10 rebounds on 5-6 shooting, and Andre Jackson was everywhere on defense and contributed 10 points, 13 rebounds and five assists.

The mental toughness and poise UConn so far in not only these two games and throughout the season has been remarkable to see. Even when it has been cold on offense or struggling with foul trouble or turnovers, the players and Dan Hurley have been calm and communicated well with one another, eventually finding a solution to these problems. This is despite incorporating so many new players, who have immediately brought into UConn’s culture and established chemistry with the returnees. These qualities that the team has showed it should be able to keep its cool against any team, no matter the stage.

Offense Shows Remarkable Depth Throughout the Entire Invitational   

Throughout the preseason, Hurley and his staff along with the players were always talking about how UConn would have great depth and more versatility on both ends due to their experienced transfers and the skills of Karaban and Clinigan. Through the first five games, that depth was on display and much needed because of the absence of multiple starters at different times. Still, fans still needed to see that many players could make an impact against quality teams, and the Phil Knight Invitational was a perfect stage to have their questions answered. Suffice to say, the Huskies answered any and all doubters.   

Tristen Newton was the lynchpin of the offense through all three games. Newton averaged 15 points, 5.7 assists and 4 rebounds while also snatching six steals. He shot 52% overall, 8-12 from three and     15-17 at the free throw line. Newton is becoming more comfortable as the team’s point guard, and displayed poise, a strong handle, and the ability to find open teammates for quality scoring opportunities, especially against Oregon and Alabama. While Newton was still inconsistent at making shots inside the arc, his 3-point shot was much cleaner in the tourney and he demonstrated the ability to both shoot from the top of the key and off screens. And of course, Newton continued to be a machine at getting to and converting at the free throw line, especially during scoring runs. Newton has clearly become more comfortable from game to game, and I think he has already established himself as a strong replacement for R.J. Cole.

Adama Sanago did not quite play at an All-American level in the Invitational, but he was still solid offensively against Oregon and dominant at times versus Alabama. Sanago plaid second fiddle to Newton in the quarterfinals bit still had a very efficient day, scoring 12 points on 5-7 shooting with 6 rebounds (2 offensive). In the semifinals, he was a huge handful in the paint on his way to 25 points on 8-12 shooting, 4 rebounds and 2 blocks. Sanogo did an outstanding job in that game of both bullying defenders and scoring on jumpers and shot fakes, as well as passing out of the post. His offensive performance against Ohio State was ugly and marred by foul trouble (just 4 points on 1-5 shooting in 22 minutes), but Sanago at least contributed some solid defense to make up for it. Considering how hard-working and intelligent Sanago is, I have no doubt that he will get in the gym and work on what he needs to do to be more efficient against Oklahoma State Thursday and going forward.

The rest of the team made their unique contributions on offense throughout the three games. Hawkins brough some much needed sharpshooting in the first two games, scoring a combined 34 points and shooting 42% overall and 8-20 from three. He showed the ability to knock down contested 3-pointers and help the Huskies go on key runs, while also driving to the hoop and making layups or free throws when needed. Alex Karaban continued to be a Swiss-Army knife for UConn, scoring when needed (especially on the perimeter), getting big offensive rebounds, and doing an outstanding job of moving the ball to teammates for scoring opportunities. Clinigan, who we will talk about more later, was a nightmare for the three opponents as a substitute for Sanogo. His height and bulk made it almost impossible for the defenders to contain Clinigan on alley-oops or putbacks, at least without fouling. The Bristol freshman also averaged 3 offensive rebounds in the tournament. Joey Calcaterra continued to be deadly on the perimeter, shooting 6-10 from three and averaging almost 10 points, and recorded four assists against Oregon. While Jackson’s scoring did not show up until the championship game, the junior still had five assists both in that game and against the Ducks, and grabbed three offensive rebounds against Alabama and ISU. Finally, Hassan Diarra came up with seven huge points in just 15 minutes, in addition to his usual strong defense.

UConn’s offensive depth is reflected in all the analytics they have recorded this season. It has assisted 65.9% of field goals, which ranks 10th in the nation. The team is 13th in offensive rebounding percentage (38.1), 19th in effective field goal percentage (56.8), 23rd in 2-point percentage (57.7), and 59th in 3-point percentage (37.1). The Huskies bench outscored its starters against Iowa State, and came close to doing so in the other two games. With the improved shooting and ball movement and handling of this year’s squad, UConn can have good offensive nights against any opponent, something which certainly not the case last season.

Defense and Rebounding Continues to be Outstanding Against Big Time Programs      

Over the last few seasons, UConn has been defined by its consistently strong defense and proficiency on the boards. So far this season that has not changed, especially with the added depth the team has. In the Phil Knight Invitational, the Huskies held Oregon, Alabama, and Iowa State under 45% shooting and 31.8% from three overall. Alabama and Oregon committed 21 and 17 turnovers respective, resly, and all three opponents had more turnovers than assists. Finally, UConn outrebounded Oregon and came close to doing so against an excellent rebounding Crimson Tide Squad. It then whipped Iowa State on the boards, outrebounding the Cyclones 46-19!, leading to a ton of second-chance points and fastbreak opportunities.

While the Huskies team defense was ultimately what stood out, there were a few individual players who had great performances. Newton did an excellent job of pressuring ball handlers up front and forcing difficult passes, and had a combined seven assists against Oregon and Alabama. The 6-5 Newton’s defensive rebounding was also excellent as always. Hawkins was a little too aggressive at times, resulting in foul trouble, but ultimately continued to demonstrate his improvement as an on-ball defender. The duo of Sanago and Clinigan shut down the frontcourt frequently. Sanago was great on the defensive boards and consistently altered shots. Clinigan completely blocked shooters from getting to the rim, and grabbed a combined 14 defensive rebounds in the three games and had four blocks against Oregon. Ultimately however, UConn’s great defensive performance was captured through the incomparable work of Jackson.

Jackson established himself as arguably the best defender in the Big East last season, and despite playing just four games so far, he may be the favorite for that crown. The junior’s on-ball defense was spectacular in the tournament against both guards and forwards. Jackson constantly forced difficult passes and altered shots, and helped set up steals and blocks for both himself and teammates. He also did an outstanding job of rebounding on defense and recorded several contested rebound opportunities. Jackson had two steals against Oregon and Iowa State, blocks against Alabama and ISU, and averaged six offensive boards per game, including 10 against the Cyclones. Jackson’s athleticism and hustle was constantly on display in the three games as he leapt off the TV screen, and impressed both the announcers and opposing coaches. The Invitational was another reminder of why Jackson can be one of UConn’s most valuable players even when he is not scoring much.

Dan Hurley Continuing to Come into His Own as a Head Coach

After UConn’s first-round loss in the NCAA Tournament last season, there was a lot of grumbling about Hurley’s ability to take UConn to the next level. That grumbling kicked into overdrive after the Huskies had four players transfer in the offseason. Hurley blocked out these criticisms and immediately set about looking for quality transfers who could address the program’s shortcomings last season (inconsistent outside shooting, ball-handling, quality defenders on the perimeter and small forward with size), and be a good fit alongside the remaining roster as well as Karaban and Clinigan. Hurley seems to have hit the jackpot with his portal additions, and made adjustments to UConn’s playing style which have turned them into a more well-rounded squad. Factor in all of this as well as Hurley’s calmer demeanor on the sidelines, and you have a squad that is looking like one of the best squads in America after this past weekend.

At the PKI85, Hurley did a great job of making substitutions which had an immediate impact on both ends, especially offense. This was especially apparent in the finale against Iowa State when Hurley took out Hawkins with nearly 16 minutes remaining when he got two fouls (the second a technical for arguing the first call), and did not put him back in for the rest of the game. This sent a message to Hawkins about he needed to better control his emotions and be more disciplined on defense. Hurley also recognized that Sanago was struggling and rode Clinigan as a result, being rewarded with a dominant performance that helped the Huskies pull away. Other examples of smart decisions in the final included Hurley recognizing that Diarra matched up well against the Cyclones and using him heavily in the first half with Newton in foul trouble, giving Jackson significantly more minutes, and maintaining his cool when the referees were making very questionable foul calls. The ability to effectively substitute, maintain composure and allocate minutes was consistently on display against both Oregon and Alabama as well. Throughout the tournament, Hurley also switched up defenses when needed, with examples being occasionally using zone and relying on the high hedge regularly against the Crimson Tide.

The maturity and adaptability Hurley has demonstrated from the beginning of his UConn tenure until now has been remarkable. He will make poor decisions and deal with significant challenges as UConn plays more close games and must face quality Big East opponents at least two times, but this is a mature team that appears to be more prepared for those challenges than last season. If Hurley can keep these  Huskies as one of the best teams in America, Storrs will continue to be a destination for great recruits and transfers as long as he is there.  

Fans Need to be More Positive About Team

During the few weeks leading up to UConn’s preseason against Stonehill Monday night, I noticed a frustrating trend from the Huskies fanbase: Way too many members of Husky nation are extremely cynical about this team. Yes, there is the small contingent whom are already certain UConn will be lifting the national championship trophy. But many, especially online, are constantly questioning the team’s reliance on transfers and the ability of certain players to live up to the hype. These fans are especially skeptical of Dan Hurley’s ability to adjust as a coach and lead the Huskies to greater postseason success.

I don’t mind reasonable skepticism about UConn’s ability to be successful this season, and share a lot of the same questions and concerns as these fans to some extent. However, this cynicism is misplaced. Yes, there will be growing pains as the team integrates a lot of new faces and probably new styles of play (four-out on offense and a faster pace of play, zone on defense), and the Huskies will eventually have to demonstrate they can consistently win close games against tough opponents. But there will also be more depth and likely offensive versatility than the last few seasons, players are primed to take large steps forward, and the transfers each offer clear strengths already. The beginning of the UConn season is a time for optimism, not worry.

First, I believe the fanbase is expressing too much concern about transfers Tristen Newton (senior guard), Hassan Diarra (junior guard), and Naheim Alleyne (senior guard). UConn has shown already that they can develop transfers from smaller conferences into impact players in R.J. Cole and Tyrese Martin, and that will continue.

Newton, a 6-5, 190-pound combo guard, had a huge season at East Carolina last season, averaging 17.7 points and 5 assists and earning First Team All-AAC honors. He averaged just under 12 points overall in three seasons at ECU. Newton showed last season that he can take over games and be a floor general against strong competition, and brings more size and speed to UConn’s backcourt.

As he gets comfortable against the tougher competition, Newton should develop into a go-to scorer for the Huskies. He does not need to be the guy constantly handling the ball for UConn with Andre Jackson and Diarra also right there, and I don’t expect him to be. Newton just needs to gain the trust of his teammates and Hurley and demonstrate reliable ball-handling. By the middle of the season, I think Newton will be main guy the team relies on to attack the rim and get big-time buckets and free throws in crunch time. Dan Hurley has indicated he has high expectations for Newton and that he needs to work hard to meet them, and I believe Newton can meet Hurley’s demands.

 While Newton’s success will likely depend on his ability to create offense for both himself and others and make baskets when the game is on the line, Darra’s will depend on him being a junkyard dog and doing all the little things, especially on defense. The 6-2, 190-pound combo guard from Queens and Texas A&M is highly regarded as an on-ball defender and can use his size and strength to force turnovers. He showed at A&M that he can be a primarily ball-handler when necessary, and improved his assist-to-turnover ratio tremendously from freshman to sophomore year.

While Diarra is still an inconsistent offensive player, he similarly made strides as a shooter and demonstrated he could be a threat behind the arch, most memorably in the Big 12 Tournament. Diarra was highly regarded by the Aggies coaches for his work ethic and competitiveness, and all reports indicate Hurley and his staff feel the same way. I strongly believe that Darra’s strength and competitiveness could help him develop into a solid rebounder for a guard of his size.

Diarra seems like he is destined to eventually become a fan favorite at UConn. With his defense, ability to play the point, and improved shooting, he could be a sparkplug off the bench or an ideal running partner for Andre Jackson, Newton, and Jordan Hawkins. Diarra showed off his versatility against Stonehill (11 points on 5-8 shooting, 5 rebounds, 7 assists, 3 steals) as well as his intensity. Reports coming out in the preseason said that Diarra was demonstrating improved shooting and the ability to run the offense effectively, and Hurley seems to get the most out of any player who plays all out. In a few years, Diarra could emerge just like Christian Vital did as a senior.

While Alleyne players shooting guard and not forward, it appears to me his game is a better, more complete version of Tyler Polley. The 6-4, 195-pound senior transfer was a reliable perimeter scorer in three seasons at Virginia Tech and made 37.3% of his threes for the Hokies last season. He is over 38% in his career from deep. While Alleyne missed all four threes, he took against Stonehill, there is no reason to think those numbers will not be similar at UConn. With his size and shooting range, Alleyne should open up the offense for whomever else is on the floor.

Alleyne is more than just a 3-point specialist, however. He is considered a solid defender, and had four steals in the opener. Alleyne can play at small forward against certain teams and has been both a starter and sixth man. His maturity and extensive experience playing in a high-major league can allow him to be a leader for the Huskies, especially in these first few weeks while Jackson and possibly Hawkins are out with injury.

Most of the feedback about Alleyne’s play in the preseason was positive, and Hurley expressed satisfaction with the flexibility he offers UConn on both ends of the court. Alleyne is the perfect complimentary player every good program needs to improve.

I have become even more frustrated over the skepticism fans have in the ability of Adama Sanogo, Andre Jackson and Jordan Hawkins to become more complete and efficient players. All the offseason work Sanogo put in to expand his game, and the team’s efforts to make the offense more flexible, can allow him to be the Big East Player of the Year. Fans have read the reports/stories and seen video about Adama expanding his shooting range and passing ability, and his passing certainly looked much smoother against Stonehill. I expect Sanogo to become a more disciplined defender over the course of the year as well, especially if Hurley fully adjusts the defense so Sanogo must defend the high hedge less. I also think that with the encouragement of Hurley, Sanogo will be more aggressive offensively (more dunks please!). Finally, the likely improvement of the Huskies shooting can make it much easier for Sanogo to score and create offense for others. Fans will have to wait a while to see if he can consistently make jumpers against good teams when the opportunity arises. But Sanogo has told the rest of the Big East for two years that they should not bet against him.

Andre Jackson is already likely the most essential player to UConn reaching its ceiling not named Sanogo, as well as my favorite Husky now that Martin left. He improved tremendously as a defender (I would argue he is one of the best in the Big East) and rebounder last season, and as a ball-handler in the second half of the season. While Jackson’s offensive game was extremely inconsistent and his shooting mechanics remained ugly, he significantly improved his shooting last season and was a 3-point threat, albeit with very few attempts. With all the hard work Jackson put in to improve those mechanics and ability to finish at the rim during the offseason, and the positive feedback Hurley and reporters have given about those efforts, I think Jackson will be a more aggressive offensive player and consistent scoring threat. He may even be able to average double digits.

While I am excited about Jackson’s potential to improve as a scorer, I am way more bullish in his ability to run the offense and create good scoring opportunities for others. Jackson’s speed, vision and unselfishness is unique, especially for a forward. If he can just be more disciplined and not always go for the spectacular pass, he can be a nightmare for defenders, especially on the fastbreak. Throw in Jackson’s eagerness to embrace the role of the Huskies vocal leader, and there is a reason Hurley thinks Jackson is the heart and soul of the team. I need a little time to see if Jackson can really be a point guard like he claims, especially if Jackson is rusty when he returns from injury in a week or so, but the NBA will come calling if he can.

I am a little less confident in Hawkins’s ability to take as big of a leap offensively as fans and pundits are predicting, and that the added muscle and weight he put on in the offseason will still make it easier for him to score and avoid injury. And of course, that fear of him getting injured has only increased since his possible concussion against Stonehill that will keep him out at least one game. Hawkins has excellent shooting mechanics and was consistently praised for the offensive improvements he showed in preseason practice and scrimmages by both Hurley and reporters. While James Bouknight was better as a freshman than Hawkins, Hurley has shown the ability to develop talented freshman into sophomore stars in both Bouknight and Sanago. There is a reason NBA scouts are so high on him and he is already projected to be a first-round pick if he leaves UConn. If Hawkins can improve his ball-handling and ability to score around the rim, Hawkins will be a double-digit scorer and could consistently take over games. And as a result, UConn will likely go on a postseason run and put Hawkins in position to be a possible lottery pick next summer. 

Finally, I feel a small but loud contingent of fans believe that based on the last two seasons, Dan Hurley is incapable of winning a majority of close games against quality teams and taking the Huskies to a Big East Tournament championship and far in the NCAA tournament. These fans have unrealistic expectations for Hurley and can sound ridiculous when saying he should be fired if UConn does not get to the Sweet 16 or further in the next two seasons. I am frustrated by how the past two seasons ended, and feel that Hurley can be too slow to make in-game adjustments and call timeouts, especially in their final minutes. His tendency to always be highly emotional in games also appears from my high to have a negative effect when the players are struggling. Still, Hurley’s strengths fair outweighs his faults. He appeared to make the necessary roster adjustments in the offseason for UConn to became a more well-rounded team.

Hurley is an excellent defensive coach, and his teams the last two seasons have been especially strong at guarding the paint and getting blocks, led by the incomparable Isiah Whaley. With the departure of Martin to the NBA and Whaley and Cole to other professional leagues, Hurley made sure to bring in two well-regarded defenders in Diarra and Alleyne. While Hurley’s offenses have been more limited, he made a concentrated effort to add better shooting and ball-handling through both the portal and recruiting (for this season and next). As already stated, generating improved perimeter shooting should give Sanago more space to operate in the post, which he frequently lacked last season.

In regards to returning players, Hurley has been clear that he plans on playing Jackson at point guard frequently when he returns. While that is an audacious move to make with a guy that was recruited as a forward and has been sloppy with his passing at times, it has a ton of upside. Jackson has outstanding court vision and length and has improved his ball handling, and a point guard with his speed and size could help UConn run a devastating fastbreak. Finally, Hurley has indicated he is willing to play more zones and other defensive styles with this year’s team instead of being so reliant on the high hedge. I think doing so successfully will help the big guys a ton, especially Sanago and Clinigan, and possibly allow the Huskies to have more energy for the end of games.

I am sure I will be plenty critical of Hurley on this blog at times throughout the season, especially if the Huskies continue to lose close games like they did last year. But if Hurley truly can adjust and learn from his mistakes, this is the year the team should break through in March Madness and win a few games. Who knows what will happen in future seasons, but it is nice to have a top-5 recruiting class coming to Storrs next season.

I urge Husky nation to embrace this fun team with so many newcomers. Enjoy the opening slate of games and the opportunity to see less experienced players contribute, and do not freak out if UConn drops a game or two when they start facing powerful out-out conference teams. This group has the talent to seriously challenge for the Big East titles and go on a tournament run, and is showing a lot of promise already despite missing some key players. If UConn has a strong year, it will put them in position to likely challenge for a Final Four in the next couple of years with the talent coming in. Support the players and enjoy the ride!

Examining the Transfers Who Left: A Bigger Picture

With UConn getting a trio of strong transfers so far, I will absolutely give coverage of each transfer as well as the larger impact they should have on the program in the next week. Before that however, I have to examine the four transfers UConn lost (Rahsool Diggins, Akok Akok, Jalen Gaffney and Corey Floyd Jr.), the circumstances behind each player’s decision and the impact they had on the Huskies while in Storrs. In a lot of ways, I think the three transfers UConn has gotten in the portal so far this offseason are a net positive over the ones they lost. However, losing each transfer is very disappointing, especially the transfers of Gaffney and especially Floyd. One thing that’s obvious: Having at least one or two players transfer from the Huskies in the portal should be the norm in the next few years, particularly with the attractiveness of NIL deals.

Below are my thoughts about the four transfers. It is said to see them all go. However, I think the transfers will as a group likely find better opportunities with their new programs.

Rahsool Diggins

When Diggins first committed to UConn in the summer of 2020, there was a hope that he could be the next great UConn point guard. The four-star Philly product was seen as a top-10-point guard in the 2021 class and a top-60 player overall, and was named the Pennsylvania Player of the Year as a senior playing for Archbishop Wood High School. The Huskies snagged Diggins over blue-chip programs like Florida, Villanova and Kansas a long with over strong ones. On the recruiting circuit, Diggins was seen as a strong ball handler who could attack and score at the basket, and was especially heavily praised for his leadership ability. When he arrived in Storrs last summer, Diggins continued to be praised for his potential, swagger and leadership potential.

At the beginning of this past season, it was hoped by fans that Diggins could become a reliable backup at point guard to R.J. Cole and Gaffney by the end of the year and a general sparkplug off the bench. However, he never displayed the ability to do so. Diggins only twice played more than seven minutes (against Central in the opener and Grambling State) and no more than three minutes in the four Big East games he played in. Ultimately, Diggins shot just 3-10 and committed 6 turnovers against 4 assists. Diggins turnover rate in the miniscule minutes he played was 45.6%.

Like most fans, I was desperate to see Diggins appear more, especially with Gaffney disappointing throughout Big East play. However, it is understandable to me why Hurley didn’t give him more run time. Diggins appeared overwhelmed when he did appear during garbage time, struggling to run the offense and handle the ball efficiently. There is the caveat that Diggins almost never played with multiple starters. Between his play and the whispers about him struggling on defense and consistently running the offense in practice, it seems that Diggins was not ready for the level of play as a freshman. If Diggins had been performing well in practice as the season went on, I think it’s likely that he would have taken minutes from Gaffney, just as Jalen did as a freshman from Alterique Gilbert.

After looking at a handful of programs on the East Coast, including Penn State, Diggins decided to transfer to UMass and play for new head coach Frank Martin, who led South Carolina to the Final Four five years ago. The decision makes a lot of sense, as Diggins will be able to play for a coach who’s determined to give opportunities to young players and should get more playing time at a slightly lower level of competition. Diggins definitely has the skills to be an effective point guard for a winning A-10 program and possesses the drive to succeed. Diggins decision to not stay longer at UConn to compete for playing time still stings, but it makes sense when he knew Dan Hurley would bring in an experienced point guard as a transfer, which turned into Tristen Newton. Best of luck to him.

Akok Akok

The big man entered Storrs from Putnam Science Academy three years ago with a ton of hype, and his athletic and energetic style of play endured him to fans early on as a freshman. Unfortunately, Akok’s Achilles tear in February of his first year was a devastating injury that had a huge effect on his athleticism and overall game, larger than myself and most fans expected. Even when he re-entered the rotation for good this past season, Akok’s playing time was very inconsistent and he never showed the same athleticism he had as a freshman. After his checkered year and no guarantee he would be a go-to guy as a senior, Akok understandably decided he needed a fresh start and transferred to Georgetown to play for Patrick Ewing.    

Akok played in 23 games this past season and was absent from a decent number due to a combo of health and matchups issues. He appeared in just three of the last 13 games and played double-digit minutes in Big East play just five times. Akok, who is “6-9” and has a larger wingspan but is pretty skinny, scored in double figures just three times (against St. Bonaventure, Grambling State and Coppin State) and grabbed double-digit rebounds just once. Akok was still plenty effective as shot blocker in certain games, recording 3 or more in seven games.

Overall, Akok had an offensive rating of 126.4 and a true shooting percentage of 55.2%. Akok had a defensive rebounding percentage of 16.6% and blocked 8.2% of shots on offense. Akok’s offensive statistics were heavily boosted by his shooting from deep, as he made over 46% of 3-pointers on 28 attempts. However, Akok shot under 50% inside the arc, with most of these coming right at the rim, and missed 12 of 18 free throws.

Because of his shot-blocking and perimeter shooting skills, Akok seemed like a good complement to Isiah Whaley and Adama Sanago in the frontcourt. There was also a good possibility he could become more effective over the course of the season as he built up stamina during the Big East schedule. These hopes never lived up to the reality, however. While Akok remained an excellent weak-side shot blocker, the athleticism he lost from injury and body type made it tough for Akok to be a reliable defender and shut down guys 1-on-1. On offense, Akok similarly lacked explosiveness and never scored consistently in the paint. On both ends of the floor, he looked disengaged at times and now did not have the stamina to play for long stretches at a time.

I agree with some fans that Hurley did not give Akok enough minutes on the floor at times to help spread out the offense or provide another shot-blocking and rebounding threat. In the end though, it was hard to deny that Akok got lost easily on defense and was not well-incorporated on offense. Considering the high ceiling Akok originally indicated he could reach it is a sad story that injuries caused Akok to currently be less skilled.

When Akok decided to transfer he mainly looked at Georgetown, Pittsburgh and West Virginia as possible destinations before deciding to join Georgetown and Patrick Ewing for next season. Akok was told he could get more consistent playing time and maybe even become a starter in DC, and would provide the Hoyas the perimeter scoring and defense they are looking for as the program looks to get back on track. With no guarantee of how much playing time he would see in Storrs and a loaded frontcourt, it is understandable that Akok chose to follow a fresh start. The best of luck to him, and I’ll always remember the highlight-reel plays he provided.

Jalen Gaffney

Before Diggins was looked at as the next great UConn point guard, it was Gaffney (one of many New Jersey natives on the Huskies) who fans hoped would hold that title. Gaffney came in as higher-ranked than James Bouknight and for good reason. And as a freshman, he showed a lot of promise and even took the starting point guard position from Alterique Gilbert late in the season. Unfortunately, Gaffney did not take a huge step forward as a sophomore and then underperformed nearly across the board this past season. When Hurley made it clear that he was going to go after point guards in the transfer portal, Gaffney chose to pursue a starting role at Florida Atlantic, a member of Conference USA.

After having an offensive rating of 107.7 and true shooting percentage of 55.4% as a sophomore, Gaffney’s advanced shooting marks fell to 103.4 and 48.9% as a junior. His traditional field goal shooting percentage also suffered, as Gaffney shot just 38.1% inside the arc and 29.5% on 3-pointers, nearly seven percent lower than 2021. Gaffney attacked the basket much less than expected and struggled to finish in the paint, and his struggles from deep limited UConn’s ability to stretch the floor. This was after he was expected to be one of the team’s main 3-point threats entering the season. Gaffney did not score in double-digits in Big East play and had an offensive rating of just 91.6 while shooting 30% from the field.

Gaffney’s ball-handling did improve somewhat as a junior but slipped in Big East play. He had an assist rate of 27.2% overall against a turnover rate of 21.4%, but his turnover rate jumped to 27.3% in the conference, three points higher from his sophomore year. He frequently had multiple assists outside the conference early in the season but just three times in conference play. Overall, his assist to turnover ratio was roughly 1.5-1. Gaffney generally did a decent job of managing the offense when R.J. Cole played off the ball, but was still inconsistent and could not be relied upon to run the offense with Cole sitting against the best teams. His shooting struggles and mediocre defensive play caused Gaffney to lose playing time over the course of the season and put more pressure on Cole while forcing Andre Jackson to also act as a secondary ballhandler. On defense, Gaffney was a reliable threat to get steals and his on-ball defense was somewhat improved, but still struggled to defend high-quality guards despite his size.

Gaffney’s inability to live up to expectations in 2022 was especially frustrating because of the strong end to his sophomore year how much fans and Dan Hurley were hoping he would bring. All preseason long, they kept hearing about how Gaffney “would be more aggressive” and “take on a leadership role” while allowing Cole to play off-ball more. A large part of the reason UConn didn’t really look at transfers in 2021 was because of how much faith Hurley and the other coaches had in Gaffney, and it’s just sad that he could not fulfill it. By the end of the season, Gaffney appeared timid and somewhat disengaged. I don’t mean to gang up on him, but I had definitely soured on Gaffney by midway through the season.

All this being said, Gaffney could find a lot of success at Florida Atlantic. It’s a program that is trying to build on a solid 2022 season and needed an experienced point guard. Gaffney’s size, athleticism and experience should give him a big heads up against a lot of the competition in C-USA. In addition, I am sure he will be motivated to prove his critics wrong and reach his potential in his two years at FAU (second his extra year of eligibility due to Covid-19). After representing the Huskies well both on and off the court, a fresh start for Gaffney could be wonderful for him and I will be rooting for Gaffney from afar.

Corey Floyd Jr.

The full story of what exactly happened with Floyd Jr.’s decision to leave UConn, where he had redshirted this past year and was primed to get solid playing time in 2023, and transfer to rival Providence (his father’s alma matter) will not likely be understood for a few years. All I know is that hearing he was entering the transfer portal in April and then going to the Friars, where he originally was originally recruited, made me equal parts sad, angry and confused. A month plus later, it’s confusion that reigns the day.

Floyd, another NJ recruit who played at Roselle Catholic, was a “6-4” four-start recruit and considered by recruiters as one of the best combo guards in his class. When he originally committed to the Huskies last winter, he chose them over Providence and Rutgers as well as a handful of other strong programs. Floyd was targeted by Hurley and lead recruiter Kamani Young for his ball-handling skills and ability to attack the basket, jump-shooting and strength. Floyd reclassified to 2022 so he could go to UConn early, and agreed with Hurley and coaches to redshirt this past season to work on improving his game and strength and get the chance to compete against the whole team in practice. When Floyd said that he would initially redshirt, he also promised he would work hard to improve and get it lifted so he could compete in games.   

From all reports, Floyd improved very highly over the course of the season and became stronger. Hurley even said right after the season that Floyd could have helped UConn with the depth issues it experienced at guard, although he gave no indication that Floyd would have played much if at all. There is almost nothing known about why Floyd decided to leave and chose Providence specifically versus the other schools that tried to attract him in the portal, most notably Rutgers. He had not given any interview quotes about the subject and Hurley or Friars coach Ed Cooley isn’t going to reveal Floyd’s thinking process.

However, there were Internet rumors that Floyd and his family had been told by Hurley that his redshirt would be lifted if Floyd performed well enough in practice, and yet Hurley had decided to not do so when Floyd thought he was outperforming members of the rotation in practice before saying Floyd could have helped the Huskies after the season ended. Those rumors caused the Floyd family to lose faith in Hurley and Corey to defect to Providence. Considering how the timeline played out, that tracks. This is especially true if there weren’t any extenuating issues with Floyd’s family that caused him to decide to leave.  

Obviously, I am not a psychic and have no insight into what happened between Floyd and UConn and why he decided to leave so abruptly when it looked like there would be good opportunity to earn playing time next season. It’s not hard to conclude however that Floyd likely mismanaged Floyd. With the transfer portal currently being a Wild West, it makes no sense to redshirt a player for an entire year, especially when he had the potential and immediate strengths that Floyd offered. In retrospect, what should have been done was to try and see if Floyd could have finished his high school credits early and then joined the team for spring practices and workouts in 2021, similar to what Alex Karaban is doing no and what Akok did before him. That way, Floyd would have been able to work on his game and build relationships with teammates while seeing the program and Hurley up close. If he had changed his mind and then decommitted before the season started, it would have made much more sense. Instead, Floyd got to improve his skills and strength and conditioning while not having the reward of playing in games, and UConn, Hurley and Floyd’s former teammates are left holding the short end of the stick.

While my feelings on Floyd’s decision to go to Providence have mostly stabilized in the month since it happened, there was definitely a sense of bitterness when he chose the Friars of all programs. How dare he go to a rival right down the road? But Floyd is entitled to look out for his best interests, and I can see him becoming one of their team’s best players over the next two to three years. I just hope he has his worst games against the Huskies. To all fans, I urge them to not be angry at Floyd or blame Hurley for letting him get away if Floyd becomes a star. Instead, blame how messed up the current transfer portal system is and pray that a similar situation doesn’t occur with another UConn recruit. Adios, Corey. I hardly knew you.     

My thoughts on UConn Making the NCAA tournament

Three days, folks. In three days, the Huskies basketball program will be back in the NCAA tournament where it belongs. It’s a wonderful thing to say.

UConn (15-7), which is competing in March Madness for the first time since 2016, is seeded seventh in the East region and will be facing No. 10 Maryland (16-13) on Saturday. If it wins, it would almost definitely face No. 2 Alabama (24-6), which is playing No. 15 Iona in the first round. on Monday. As with most 7-10 tournament games, it appears to be a toss-up, though most metrics have UConn slightly favored (Ken Pomery gives it a 57% chance of winning, with the predicted score 66-64).

I will certaintly have more analysis of the game and the keys to the Huskies winning later in the week. First, however, I wanted to briefly reflect on the program’s accomplishment and its significance both in the moment and for the future. No matter what happens against Maryland and other opponents if UConn wins, earning an at-large bid in 2021 can be the first step in UConn eventually becoming an elite program again.

Here is a list and description of my immediate thoughts below. Please enjoy.

Getting to the NCAA tournament is a wonderful reward for all the seniors have given to the program

Isiah Whaley, Tyler Polley and Josh Carlton have each faced a ton of challenges during their UConn careers. As freshman, the trio had to experience the ugly final season of the Kevin Ollie regime. Whaley was buried on the bench as a sophomore and at the start of his junior season until he broke out during conference play. Polley was having a solid junior season before tearing his ACL, and had his recovery process interfered with due to COVID-19. After being named the American Athletic Conference Most Improved Player as a sophomore, Carlton had a disappointing junior year and lost his starting spot at center this season. And of course, they were unable to compete in tournament play last season when it was shut down due to the virus. Through all of this and their wild, truncated senior season, Whaley, Polley and Carlton have been model players for the program.

Any of the seniors could have understandably transfered to play at another school when Ollie was fired, and yet they stuck it out and showed tremendous loyalty to the program, Dan Hurley and their teammates. Whaley, Polley and Carlton have each had impressive careers in different ways and acted as team leaders this season. They did well in the classroom and earned their degrees in four years, and none of the three got in any trouble, at least that I am aware of. Whether any of the seniors stays at UConn to play a fifth year or not, they deserve the honor of playing in the tournament for the Huskies. The team wouldn’t be where it is without them, and the seniors legacies are secured.

Dan Hurley helps lead yet anothe program to its goal

Hurley is nicknamed “The Carpenter” for a reason-he builds programs, and quickly. Despite being just 48 and having only coached for 11 seasons, Hurley has turned around each of the three program’s he’s coached (Wagner, Rhode Island, and now UConn). At URI, he led the Rams to their first NCAA tournament appearance and win of the century in 2017, and did the same the next year. Now in just three short years, he’s completely turned around UConn basketball as it returned to its rightful home in the Big East, and reached one of the team’s major goals this season by leading it to a tournament berth.

Hurley has helped this year’s squad build an identity based around excellent defense and rebounding as well as depth. His abilities as a teacher and leader can be seen through the improvement of the team as well as the development of individual players like James Bouknight, Adama Sanogo and Isiah Whaley. Hurley has helped build a buzz around UConn, and his strengths as a recruiter already have and will continue to pay off. Hurley is far from perfect as a coach, and he would be the first to admit it. At this point though, it is clear Hurley is the right man to lead UConn going forward.

Qualifying for the tournament is the next huge step for UConn to get back in the national spotlight

The program began to receive national attention again last year when it was announced it would return to the Big East starting in 2020-21, and James Bouknight’s emergence as one of the country’s top freshman at the end of last season also drew some eyes. However, the attention really started to come in the preseason when the Huskies were picked to finish fourth in the Big East. Their win over USC and strong start amped up the excitement surrounding UConn even more. While the team’s struggles during the middle of the season caused awareness of it to ebb somewhat, the Huskies great play down the stretch with Bouknight back led them to be the favorite to win the Big East tournament among both pundits/writers and college basketball fans. Even after the loss to Creighton, UConn is a trendy Final Four pick. Having most of the Huskies Big East games broadcast on national television again (mainly through FS1 and Fox) has also been a huge boom, as it makes it much easier for causual college basketball fans to check out the team.

Making the tournament is already a huge step, especially in this crazy season. Now if UConn can win multiple games in March Madness and make a deep run, I think it will solidify the program as the second most prominent in the Big East going forward. Although the Huskies “brand” has diminished somewhat in the last half decade, Hurley , Bouknight, and to a lesser extent Sanogo and Whaley are bringing it back, and recruits and national writers/pundits are taking notice. The program has a great chance to get causual fans to notice too.

James Bouknight has the perfect chance to establish himself as one of the UConn greats to all fans

Bouknight has played less than two full seasons at UConn, and yet its utterly agreed amongst the program’s fans that he is one of the most talented players to ever put on a Huskies uniform. The shooting guard is an extremely skilled offensive player who seemingly can get a basket whenever he wants. Bouknight is also an underrated rebounder and defender, and many would argue the best player in the Big East. As talented as Bouknight is however, his injury issues and poor performance against Creighton in the Big East semifinals caused his reputation to take a bit of a hit.

Bouknight has still not shown that he can take over a game and lead the Huskies to victory on the biggest stages. March Madness will give him a chance to remedy that though. First, he will get to face off against Big 10 Defensive Player of the Year Darryl Morsell, who will be Maryland’s the primary defender on Bouknight Saturday. If he wins that battle and leads the Huskies to the win, Bouknight will likely have the opportunity to lead the team to a victory against No. 2 Alabama and then beyond the Sweet Sixteen. While Bouknight will need help from his teammates, I believe he can easily take over any game and earn signature tournament moments. Bouknight can put himself on a stage with Kemba, Shabazz, and other UConn legends over the next two weeks. Let’s hope he does.